|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Tue Jun 04 2002 - 08:08:09 CDT
Having added MIME support to the Postfix MTA recently, allow me to
drop in a few cents.
Although MIME formats are defined in RFCs, enough variation exists
between implementations that even valid messages can have different
results depending on what mail (user) agent is used.
The result of invalid messages is obviously implementation defined,
as is the result of messages that expect standards not implemented
by the receiving mail (user) agent.
If you're in the content filtering business, then trying to anticipate
all the bugs/ambiguities in all the RFCs/implementations is futile.
The proper approach is to eliminate such ambiguity, by normalizing
data, that is, by transforming messages into a form that avoids
all the grey areas where implementations err, or where RFCs are
ambiguous.
That's not the job of an MTA, at least in my opinion, although an
MTA can facilitate detection of attempts to slip through the maze.
Wietse
David F. Skoll:
> Background
> ----------
>
> MIME::Tools is a very nice Perl module for parsing and constructing
> MIME-encoded mail messages. The latest stable version is 5.411a.
>
> MIME::Tools works very well on valid MIME messages. However, there
> are a number of problems if you use it to implement server-based mail
> scanning.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]