|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
RE: SHA-1 broken
From: Frank Knobbe (frank
knobbe.us)
Date: Sun Feb 20 2005 - 11:46:23 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 16:34 -0500, Scovetta, Michael V wrote:
> [...] And due to recent discoveries, we can
> push those down to 2**50 and 2**55 respectively. Breaking a composition
> would still take on the order of 2**55 (the harder of the two)
If the two algorithms are different, finding a collision in one of them
does not deliver a working collision in the other, no? Don't you have to
find a "common" collision between the two? Wouldn't that require an
effort of 2**(50+55)?
Regards,
Frank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCGMzvwBQKb2zelzoRAvyvAJ9DrHfGdLL0d6OMmyZ2nTpN6cAeiACeJUNh
yWZ5ntCAmyQOe/u9zHQK3Hk=
=0WLp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]