OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Mike Coliton (mcoliton@twmi.rr.com)
Date: Mon Sep 10 2001 - 16:53:06 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Well if doesn't, it should. Security really hasn't changed since the 50's,
    we've just moved over the policies, standards, and procedures first to our
    system enterprise and then to our gateway's.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Dexter Ramkissoon [mailto:dexter.ramkissoon@reflectone.com]
    Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:00 PM
    To: Cisspstudy (E-mail)
    Subject: RE: Information Assurance Tools

    Does anyone know if time in the Army counts as Physical Security when it
    comes to the 3 year rule?

    Dexter

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Brown, Joel [mailto:jbrown@intrusion.com]
    Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:54 PM
    To: 'Stanley, Charles'; Cisspstudy (E-mail)
    Subject: RE: Information Assurance Tools

    Stanley,

    I thought the Army was a real job! At least that is what their marketing
    people pertray it to be. When you refer to certification I guess you mean
    CISSP because of the mailing list you sent this to, however, you refer to
    each system, so I assume you mean computer or operating system. For the
    CISSP their are 10 CBK's (Common Body of Knowledge) that you must know and
    have had at least three years work experience in the Information Security
    field. I am working on taking the test this November. See
    http:\\www.isc2.org for more info. Another good place to start is
    http://www.cccure.org/ Good luck in your new career change.

    Joel

    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Stanley, Charles [mailto:StanleyC@Pragmatics.com]
    >Hi All:
    >Having recently retired from Army SF and having to get a real job, I have
    >been searching for tools and or resources dealing with certification and
    >accreditation. Understanding that most systems are specific and have
    >individual requirements, I would think that a base tool or document would
    be
    >used to begin the definition process or is the wheel generated for each
    >system.

    >Thanks,

    >Bob Stanley