OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Rob Collins (robtompc@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 17:52:26 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Just to be clear, the two different architectures are:
    Basic firewall with DMZ network architecture;
       INTERNET
          |
    LAN---o---DMZ
    Dual firewall with DMZ network architecture;
       INTERNET
          |
          o
          |___DMZ
          |
          o
          |
         LAN

    In both architectures, traffic from any one segment to
    another must first pass a firewall. The difference,
    so far as I see, is entirely in the shape of the rules
    the firewall(s) use.

    Maybe I'm not understanding 'layering'. What benefit
    does putting the second firewall in provide? I see
    complications (like an extra firewall), but no benefit
    in making traffic destined for the intranet traverse
    the DMZ.

    --- Arlen Fletcher <Arlen.Fletcher@farm-credit.com>
    wrote:
    > It's a layered defense.

    =====
    --r
    "Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again." -- F. P. Jones

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
    http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1