|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Electronic envelopes
jerome
psti.com
Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:09:41 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: dmolnar: "Re: Electronic envelopes"
- Previous message: Jim Choate: "Re: Electronic envelopes (fwd)"
- Next in thread: Anonymous: "Re: Electronic envelopes"
i though about your problem and this is my answer.
i hope you will like it :)
PROTOCOL:
1. you, Mister X, send your encrypted message to several notaries Alice, Carl
2. send the key to Bob and ask him to send it on a public network
at 00:00:00 2020
3. at 00:00:00 2020, Alice and Carl listen to this public network and
can decrypt the message at the same time.
REQUIREMENT:
- Bob, Alice, Carl don't know each other. so Alice or Carl can't corrupt
Bob to have the key before the date D.
- the 'public network' has to be broadcast to allow Alice and Carl to listen
at the same time.
- the public network must be fast enougth to ensure a good synchonisation.
for example a IP multicast group (delay <2 sec depending on the distance
between the sender and the receivers).
POSSIBLE ATTACKS:
1. break the encryption without the key. (out of scope of this protocol)
Solution: choose a stronger cryptosystem :)
2. Bob decide to send the key on the public network before the date D.
Solution: the key and the delivery time is signed by a public key.
so if bob send it on a public network, every listener of this network
will know that bob is corrupted. if the public network allow bob
to send it anonymously, Mister X itself has to monitor the public
network.
- it is assumed that this attack is unlikely because Bob can't take
profits from this action because he doesn't know Alice or Carl.
3. collaboration between Bob and Alice(or Carl): the only real threat.
Kind of Solution: because Bob and Alice don't know each other, it
will required for both to advertise to the other notaries their
files and so advertized they are corrupted. if the number of
notaries is large enougth, it is unlikely to have such advertizement
which require a generalised corrumption.
- Next message: dmolnar: "Re: Electronic envelopes"
- Previous message: Jim Choate: "Re: Electronic envelopes (fwd)"
- Next in thread: Anonymous: "Re: Electronic envelopes"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Sep 26 1999 - 20:45:21 CDT