|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: encrypted irc ?
From: Eugene Leitl (eugene.leitl
lrz.uni-muenchen.de)Date: Fri Jul 28 2000 - 15:53:34 CDT
- Next message: William H. Geiger III: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Previous message: Steve Reid: "Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and video messaging over the Internet"
- In reply to: mgraffam
idsi.net: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Next in thread: William H. Geiger III: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Reply: Eugene Leitl: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Reply: William H. Geiger III: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
mgraffam
idsi.net writes:
> It seems to me that we are not talking about client to client encryption,
> we are talking about something else. And that something, so far as I can
> see, is useless.
While encrypted dcc chat would be certainly very valuable (while I
don't have anything to hide, I don't like Echelon looking over my
shoulder (or feds poring over the server logs)), encrypting
client-server traffic would make trivial interception of cleartext
impossible, and would generically increase encrypted data traffic in
the Net.
The more high-entropy data streams are out there and the more diverse
they are, the better, imo.
- Next message: William H. Geiger III: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Previous message: Steve Reid: "Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and video messaging over the Internet"
- In reply to: mgraffam
idsi.net: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Next in thread: William H. Geiger III: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Reply: Eugene Leitl: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Reply: William H. Geiger III: "Re: encrypted irc ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]