|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: AES as a hash function?
From: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto (paulo.barreto
terra.com.br)Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 18:51:11 CDT
- Next message: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto: "Re: AES as a hash function?"
- Previous message: Bill Stewart: "Re: one time pad and random num gen"
- In reply to: Jim Gillogly: "Re: AES as a hash function?"
- Next in thread: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto: "Re: AES as a hash function?"
- Reply: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto: "Re: AES as a hash function?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 02 Oct 2000, Jim Gillogly wrote:
> Bram Cohen wrote:
> >
> > The announcement didn't mention Rijndael's applicability as a hash
> > function. I thing I remember mention in earlier AES documents that it
>
> This is covered in the materials submitted by the Rijndael team,
> in the Algorithm Specification at
> http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/aes/round2/r2algs.htm
> in section 13.
>
> > UHASH is also strictly 128-bit, it would be nice for there to be 256-bit,
> > 384-bit, and 512-bit versions as well, to keep parity with the AES.
>
> I expect SHA variants of these lengths to be available before long
> from NSA via NIST.
The 256-bit version of SHA-2 is said to be ready for a few months. I don't know
about the other two sizes, but it is likely that they are (almost) ready as
well.
Paulo Barreto.
- Next message: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto: "Re: AES as a hash function?"
- Previous message: Bill Stewart: "Re: one time pad and random num gen"
- In reply to: Jim Gillogly: "Re: AES as a hash function?"
- Next in thread: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto: "Re: AES as a hash function?"
- Reply: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto: "Re: AES as a hash function?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]