|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)
From: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto (paulo.barreto
terra.com.br)Date: Sun Oct 08 2000 - 14:53:46 CDT
- Next message: Ben Laurie: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - thereal work now begins)"
- Previous message: Bram Cohen: "Re: Rijndael & Hitachi"
- In reply to: Ben Laurie: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Next in thread: Bill Stewart: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Reply: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Ian Grigg wrote:
> > On the amount of entropy, well, I'd leave that to a cryptographer,
> > other than the observation that Rijndael has 128, 192, 256 bit keys,
> > whilst DES has 56 bits and T-DES has 168 (full).
>
> Nnng. I know you know this, but the triple DES key is only worth 112
> bits. Which is why there is no double DES.
And DES is only worth 43 bits due to linear attacks (hence by today's standards
I'd say DES is a broken cipher, irrespective of the short key size).
Paulo.
- Next message: Ben Laurie: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - thereal work now begins)"
- Previous message: Bram Cohen: "Re: Rijndael & Hitachi"
- In reply to: Ben Laurie: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Next in thread: Bill Stewart: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Reply: Paulo S. L. M. Barreto: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]