|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - thereal work now begins)
From: Ian Grigg (iang
systemics.com)Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 09:04:34 CDT
- Next message: lcs Mixmaster Remailer: "OpenSSL 3DES inner chaining?"
- Previous message: Helger Lipmaa: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- In reply to: Bill Stewart: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Reply: Ian Grigg: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - thereal work now begins)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill Stewart wrote:
>
> Does "90% faster" than DES mean "Rijndael takes 10% as long
> as DES" or "DES takes 190% as long as Rijndael"?
The latter. In the sense of twice as fast, or nearly twice as
fast. I would expect that to become better than twice as fast,
but maybe not three times as fast, in time, as better optimisations
are put in place.
iang
- Next message: lcs Mixmaster Remailer: "OpenSSL 3DES inner chaining?"
- Previous message: Helger Lipmaa: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- In reply to: Bill Stewart: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - the real work now begins)"
- Reply: Ian Grigg: "Re: q&d comparison (was Re: [Cryptix-Users] Rijndael - thereal work now begins)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]