At 09:12 AM 2/19/2001 -0300, sao19677terra.com.br wrote:
>Anonymous wrote:
>
>> At Sun, 18 Feb 2001, 18:57:13, Stefan Bellon writes:
>> > Hi there!
>> >
>> > I've been searching for a C implementation of the SHA-256 algorithm. I
>> > came across the following document:
>> >
>> > http://lists.cryptix.org/pipermail/cryptix-team/2000-October/000286.html
>> >
>> > When I contacted Ian Grigg he pointed me towards you.
>> >
>> > My main question is, what licence is upon the implementation of the
>> > above document. I'd like to use it in an project under the GPL and I'm
>> > not sure whether I'm allowed to do this.
>> >
>> > Thanks for any help in advance.
>>
>> Sure, Stefan, go ahead and use it. It is released into the public domain
>> without license or restriction. You can put whatever additional licensing
>> terms you want on it if you use it, so GPL should be fine.
>
>Sorry for the question, but how could we be sure
>you are the *same* anonymous that posted the code?
>And for that matter, how could any court possibly
>judge authorship in this case? What prevents anybody
>else from using the same amonymous remailer to claim
>her ownership too?
>
>Paulo Barreto.
>

And for that matter whether you are really you, and me is really me.

- Alex

--
Alex Alten
AltenHome.Com

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]