That would sound like the best policy, because we don't wont to go to
overkill just because we've had a problem with Spam.

Mj

On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Ben Laurie wrote:

> Peter Fairbrother wrote:
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > How about: known-good posters post unmoderated (ie make one or two sensible
> > posts and thereafter your posts are unmoderated), and everyone else is
> > moderated? I mean posters can become unmoderated, not necessarily
> > subscribers.
> >
> > After a while this should let sensible or interesting people post easily,
> > and the amount of mail requiring moderation should decline rapidly to first
> > posts plus largely filterable spam.
> >
> > This allows anonymous posting, unmoderated posting by non-subscribers, and
> > posting by the once-only. It could keep the nutters out too, along with the
> > spam, but I'd be wary of any censorship - perhaps better to just ignore
> > them.
>
> The easy thing is subscribers unmoderated, all others moderated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
>
> "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
> doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]