From: Kohlenberg, Toby (toby.kohlenbergintel.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 18:18:29 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

it was more of "replace the flag" than capture the flag, but I think
the purpose was still serving the original goals and description of
the game.

t

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blue Boar [mailto:blueboarthievco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:46 PM
> To: daveimmunitysec.com
> Cc: dailydavelists.immunitysec.com
> Subject: Re: [Dailydave] Things to read and things not to read
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 daveimmunitysec.com wrote:
>
> > Also, I admit it WAS a sysadmin game, but CTF should not
> be. If we're
> > going to make it Defend The Flag, then just have another
> game. You need to
> > make it a game where offense matters. Otherwise you just
> have everyone
> > hunkered around doing defense, like this and every other
> year. Did the
> > winning team write any exploits? I don't think they did.
> What does that
> > say?
>
> It says that there was no flag capturing, so yes, perhaps
> they've gotten a
> bit away from the original purpose. :)
>
> BB
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dailydave mailing list
> Dailydavelists.immunitysec.com
> http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]