From: the grugq (grugqhcunix.net)
Date: Fri Jan 30 2004 - 15:46:36 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

the project which replaces ptrace() for intraprocess manipulation /
control is the dude. by the same people who are writing the bastard, but
its a seperate project. Its usual right now, but we haven't written a
user interface. I'm planing on knocking up a "libptrace" which uses the
dudes process control primitives, but exports the same interface as
ptrace() so that we can just relink gdb and be good to go... but I
haven't really gotten around to it. I'm a lazy fuck, what can i say?

If there is high demand, maybe I'll kick it out this weekend. The most
recent dude should be on sourceforge if anyone wants to have a play.

peace,

--gq

Dave Aitel wrote:
> In my opinion ddd is to ollydb what a honda civic is to an audi s4. Part
> of gdb's problem is ptrace() itself. I believe the bastard's team is
> hooking the linux kernel to get around this, but it has been a long time
> since I've looked at the project.
>
> Just for starters - what memory pages are owned by what shared
> libraries, and I want to search through all of those pages for ffe4.
> This is an easy thing with olly, and impossible with ddd.
>
> Every unix hacker, including myself, who's used olly has wished they had
> it on linux.
>
> -dave
> _______________________________________________
> Dailydave mailing list
> Dailydavelists.immunitysec.com
> http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]