OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Re: [Dailydave] Blackhat Windows 2004 Report

ken_i_mfatair.net
Date: Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:03:32 CST


Thanks for the great report.

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:51:40PM -0500, Dave Aitel (daveimmunitysec.com) wrote:
> ...I still think that when you compare the
> computer security space to a person's immune system, you're making a lot
> of implicit assumptions that a good hacker won't make. I know this goes
> against the grain for a lot of people, but I think a good example is the
> "house" metaphor, which seems to gain new life with every new class of
> CISSPs. Physical metaphors, if they give us new insights into computer
> security, carry a high price tag of implicit assumptions and built-in
> weaknesses. This talk had some really interesting approaches to defeat
> worms. The defeating worms problem is a lot easier than the defeating
> multi-stage attackers problem.

I would really like to hear (get links to) more about this. I understand
how an analogy sets up implicit inferences[1]. Thus, the mapping of any
analogy is going to have gaps between it and reality. The part I am
vague on it the nature of those gaps. You mention "multi-stage". In
"Intrusion Dections with Snort", Koziol spends a little time discussing
how Snort has a weakness to a series of packets which set it up so that
subsequent packets go undetected. Is this the type of attack you are
referring to?

[1] Going back to the 70s I have been reading stuff by E.O. Wilson,
Dawkins, Dennet, Pinker, Calvin, Diamond and tons of topic related works.
I recently discovered a gem of a book that brings many of these pieces
together into a single work. Religion Explained by Pascal Boyer. If
one does not follow the latest theory of cognitive systems in the human
brain this book will get you there fast.

The folk theory of psychology summed up in Descartes' "I think, therefore,
I am" has been revealed to have huge blindspots (or gaps) as to how the
human mind really works. Boyer (who has original research to his credit)
presents an easy to read application of theory to the ages old question,
"why do humans have religion". In the process, he explains why we do a
lot of other things as well. Highly recommended even if you do keep up
in this field.

--
Ken Dyke
"Bits at the speed of light"