From: I)ruid (druidcaughq.org)
Date: Tue May 10 2005 - 17:14:52 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dave, you're 'morally reprehensible'. Fact.

http://blog.ncircle.com/archives/2005/05/trafficking_in.htm

Makes me wonder why they /continue/ to use 'stuff' from Immunity when
they seem to have such strong feelings against your company. Perhaps
Byron Sonne (bsonne) isn't in a position to make that decision, which
leads me to wonder what level of PR clearance is required to post to the
company blog. (: If they're going to take a moral stand on an issue,
and state that it bothers them that they use 'stuff' from a company they
think is immoral, they need to go all the way and take a real stand.
Otherwise their stance on the issue holds no merit.

It's like this recent issue with Universities wanting to prevent
military recruitment on-campus due to ethical reasons, yet don't want to
give up the federal funding that they receive for allowing it, thus they
back down from their ethics argument. Sell-outs? Yep.

--
I)ruid, C²ISSP
druidcaughq.org
http://druid.caughq.org

_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydavelists.immunitysec.com
https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]