From: Gavin, Michael (mgavinforrester.com)
Date: Wed Jul 13 2005 - 13:18:47 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I agree with the sentient opponents, but are the clueless operators
actually a requirement, or just a nice to have and/or often have?

Also, many products have sentient opponents, but don't security products
necessarily attempt to deter those opponents, while many/most/all
non-security products merely ignore the problem?

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: dailydave-bounceslists.immunitysec.com
[mailto:dailydave-bounceslists.immunitysec.com] On Behalf Of
dangeer.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:10 PM
To: dailydavelists.immunitysec.com
Subject: [Dailydave] definition of security product

In a discussion with marketeers and the like,
over whether a such and such a product was a
_security_ product, I came to this definition
(not that the marketing folks immediately
capitulated or anything):

===========
If a product has sentient opponents rather than
alpha particles and clueless operators, then it
is a security product.
===========

Critique?

--dan

_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydavelists.immunitysec.com
https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydavelists.immunitysec.com
https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]