|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Doc Brown (drb
nopsr.us)
Date: Fri Aug 15 2008 - 14:36:27 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:55:57AM -0700, Red Dragon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Jared DeMott
> <jdemott
crucialsecurity.com>wrote:
>
> > Ya, from what I saw (and from what ChrisEagle said) skewl just brought out
> > all the horses. With a 26 man team (to our 8-10) they were overpoweringly
> > strong, and led by the master CE to bring down the house RE style. For the
>
> I think it's just unfair in term of the number of people in the team.
> Especially for "foreign" teams since US teams normally have more ppl.
> Chris's team was like 2.5 times larger than other teams.
I certainly see what you're saying, but traditionally there has been
diminishing returns when adding more people. There's a balance for any
given set of personalities, capabilities, and hierarchy.
I think it was the Ghetto Hackers that said one year when they ran CTF
and a smaller team complained about larger team sizes: "Get more friends" :)
-Doc
--
Doc Brown
nopsr.us
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave
lists.immunitysec.com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]