|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Charles Miller (cmiller
securityevaluators.com)
Date: Wed Aug 27 2008 - 17:43:43 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
But the problem is, if there are only a handful of people who can make
a reliable exploit for a particular vulnerability (or not) and none of
them work for MS, how can MS accurately determine whether an exploit
for a particular vulnerability will be somewhat reliable or totally
reliable (or not possible at all)? Doesn't anyone remember gobbles :)
On Aug 27, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks
vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:05:42 EDT, Pusscat said:
>> My assumption would be that if it can be made reliable by anyone,
>> then it's
>> reliable. It probably shouldn't be a quantum value, collapsed by our
>> inability ;)
>
> Yes, it only has to be weaponized once.
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave
lists.immunitysec.com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]