pageexecfreemail.hu
Date: Sat Mar 28 2009 - 01:48:36 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 26 Mar 2009 at 16:28, Travis wrote:

[SEalotry deleted]
 
> I realize I've written quite a bit about this, but after seeing
> security experts discussing minutia of reverse-engineering and address
> space layout randomization and W^X and NX and stackguard and so on,
> I'm a bit surprised about seeing so many people being snarky about
> such a powerful security technology. I guess I'll just have to chalk
> it up to cynicism about any new protective technologies; it's cool to
> be dismissive and aloof. If you can find major areas it doesn't
> cover, you can call it ineffective.

do 'exploitable kernel bugs' count?

_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydavelists.immunitysec.com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]