OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Daniel Kalchev (danieldigsys.bg)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 01:42:45 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    >>>ddl-bawugdanlan.com said:
    > |The AIR-BR350 are $1329 at Ingram. These are also called
    > |"Ethernet Bridges" on Cisco's site. They have an access point
    > |mode, so cold be used at a central location to connect multiple
    > |sites. I didn't see any limit on MAC addresses passed; it's
    > |no doubt finite but what works in practice?
    >
    > Even if you did this, what about the timeout on the device connecting
    > to the bridge? I think the idea is to force you to have bridges at
    > both ends, not just in the middle.

    All Cisco Aironet clients autoconfig this when they connect to Cisco Aironet
    AP/Bridge so no problems at all.

    The same clients do not auto configure distance when connecting to other
    vendors APs (that also may have 'distance' knob)

    > |A Cisco-related consultant tells me the AIR-AP352 AP has
    > |its "bridge spacing" equivalent setting hard-coded and
    > |not adjustable, and it's set to about a mile.
    >
    > Assuming that the bridge and access point platforms still use a PCMCIA
    > card on the inside, one might assume that the timeout parameter in
    > question is set in one of the configuration RIDs (unless the bridge has
    > a special version of the radio card). Unfortunately, the programming
    > documentation for the 4800 series radio card does not mention such a
    > timeout.

    I would be especially grateful if someone could tell me the magic numbers to
    make clients work in ad-hoc mode at more than approx 20km :-)

    Daniel

    _______________________________________________
    Aironet mailing list - Aironetcsl.cse.ucsc.edu
    http://csl.cse.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/aironet