|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Ellen Dash (edash_dgi
hotmail.com)Date: Thu Jul 12 2001 - 06:34:38 CDT
Oh yes! I had noticed that before and I had fixed it! When I did a restart
to capture the logs I see that I didn't correctly fix it. Thanks for
spotting this... I'm pretty sure that it's not the problem though. (But I
will double check! I had tried taking down the eth1 and using eth2 only for
a ping w/o any success.)
Ellen
>From: Jon Knight To: Ellen Dash CC: wireless
lists.samba.org Subject: Re:
>orinoco problems Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:45:48 +0100 (BST)
>
>On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Ellen Dash wrote: > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
>00:02:2D:11:BD:F1 > inet addr:192.168.1.201 Bcast:192.168.1.255
>Mask:255.255.255.0 > [...] > eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
>00:02:2D:2B:91:F4 > inet addr:192.168.1.201 Bcast:192.168.1.255
>Mask:255.255.255.0
>
>This might be unrelated to your problem, but you've got two of your network
>devices with the same IP address. That *might* be confusing things. Try
>downing one of them (eg: `ifconfig eth1 down`) and then see if you can get
>traffic from your basestation. Also ensure that your routing is set to use
>that interface (eg: `route del default` and then `route add -net
>192.168.1.0 dev eth2`).
>
>Tatty bye,
>
>Jim'll
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]