OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Darryl Smith (Darrylradio-active.net.au)
Date: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 02:10:13 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    G'Day

    Those that are wanting to know more should have a look at the ACIF Web
    Site - www.acif.org.au for the relevant industry codes. The page of note
    is
    http://www.acif.org.au/ACIF/display/metapublist.cfm?page_id=5706&source=
    482 - and particularly ACIF C537:2002 Provision of Assistance to
    National Security, Enforcement and Government Agencies
    (http://www.acif.org.au/ACIF/display/Documentsview.cfm?r_id=116536&sourc
    e=482&meta_id=139346&page_id=5706&category=Documents) and ACIF G516:1998
    Participant Monitoring of Communications
    (http://www.acif.org.au/ACIF/display/Documentsview.cfm?r_id=102647&sourc
    e=482&meta_id=111781&page_id=5706&category=Documents)

    The ACIF is the Australian Communications Industry Forum - which the ACA
    has created to become a communications standarisation group for
    Australia...

    Sorry about the lengths of the links...

    Darryl

    ---------
    Darryl Smith, VK2TDS POBox 169 Ingleburn NSW 2565 Australia
    Mobile Number 0412 929 634 [+61 4 12 929 634 International]
    Darrylradio-active.net.au | www.radio-active.net.au

    -----Original Message-----
    From: wireless-adminlists.samba.org
    [mailto:wireless-adminlists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Jamie Lovick
    Sent: Monday, 8 July 2002 6:02 PM
    To: syd-wirelesslists.sydneywireless.com; melbwirelesswireless.org.au;
    wirelesssamba.org
    Subject: Posible future issue.

    Hi,

    I was chatting to someone the other day about the future of community
    wireless networks in Australia, and some of the regulatory issues.

    They mentioned that since the US September 11th incident, apparently now
    there are more stringent requirements from the ACA in regards to
    carriers making remote monitoring and logging abilities available to
    federal law enforcement, as required in the Telecommunications Act.

    Apparently any network providing carriage services will fall under this
    rule.

    With this in mind, since a community wireless network is effectively
    providing carriage services to its members, despite being non-commercial
    and the members being in the immediate circle, we will likely fall under
    this ruling, or be forced under it at a later stage.

    Are we willing to take on the responsibility of providing the ability
    for the network to be monitored, and to have an individual cleared and
    registered with the ACA as a sole person to manage and provide access to
    that monitoring ability, in the same way that a carrier has to?

    Food for thought.

    Regards

    Jamie

    --
    Jamie Lovick    <->  IT Consultant    <-> +614 1479 1681
    Hobby     : Doof.org                   -> jalovickdoof.org
    Director  : Drastic Solutions Pty Ltd  ->
    jalovickdrasticsolutions.com.au
    ----- Public Relations Officer - the Australian Wireless Association
    -----