OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Darryl Smith (Darryl_at_radio-active.net.au)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 02:10:29 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Using a circulator might help, but it would be best to do something
    better. The circulator will give something like 40 dB seperation.

    My suggestion would be

            * Two Antennas
            * Forward link vertically polarised
            * Reverse Link Horizontally polarised.
            * As much seperation as possible between antennas at each end.

    Darryl

    ---------
    Darryl Smith, VK2TDS POBox 169 Ingleburn NSW 2565 Australia
    Mobile Number 0412 929 634 [+61 4 12 929 634 International]
    Darrylradio-active.net.au | www.radio-active.net.au

    -----Original Message-----
    From: wireless-adminlists.samba.org
    [mailto:wireless-adminlists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Ivo
    Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 5:06 PM
    To: wirelesslists.samba.org
    Subject: Re: Re : full-duplex 802.11?

    On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:47:46AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
    > Using the same antenna is "no way". I even suspect that
    electrically
    > you can damage your cards. Using two different pair of antennas might
    > be possible but you will need to position the Rx antenna properly with

    > respect to the Tx antenna (check your angular response).

    Maybe using some kind of circulator device could help ?!

    Regards,

    Ivo.