On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 09:19:53 +0200 Laurent Boulard
<laurent.boulardlouveciennes.tt.slb.com> wrote:

> David Corcoran wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >Points well taken. It seems unanimous that the driver should take care
> of
> >Get Response. I shall update the IFD Handler documentation to
> reflect
> >this. Thank you so much for your suggestions.
> >
> Jim rees said:
>
> I agree that the application should not have to deal with this.
> But I don't think the driver should either. Anything that every
> driver must do in the same way really belongs at a higher level,
> in pc/sc.
>
> And I quite agree with him. The GET RESPONSE must be handle at a higher
>
> level between the driver and the application.
> --
> Laurent Boulard

  I don't think that the handling should be done in the driver, either. In our
implementation GET RESPONSE is done in the ICC Service Provider functions, where
I think it fits best.

  Erika Suortti
  Computing Centre
  Helsinki University of Technology
***************************************************************
Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/
To unsubscribe send an email to majordomolinuxnet.com with
unsubscribe sclinux
***************************************************************

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]