|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Ludovic Rousseau (ludovic.rousseau
free.fr)Date: Tue Jan 29 2002 - 11:52:29 CST
Le Monday 28 January 2002 à 09:28:19, David Corcoran a écrit:
> > why don't you licence the skeleton as public domain ?
>
> Last time I checked BSD was a public domain license.
BSD is not a public domain licence or maybe you can give me pointers (I
am not a lawyer).
According to [1]:
« Public Domain.
Being in the public domain is not a license--rather, it means the
material is not copyrighted and no license is needed. Practically
speaking, though, if a work is in the public domain, it might as well
have an all-permissive non-copyleft free software license. Public domain
status is compatible with the GNU GPL. »
And according to [2]:
« For the most part, the software constituting the NetBSD operating
system is not in the public domain; its authors retain their copyright. »
Your licence imposes restrictions and a copyright. So it cannot be
considered Public Domain.
I agree that using a Public Domain licence for the skeleton may be a
good idea if you want it to be used in proprietary codes (that may be
limited by your publicity clause).
Regards,
[1] http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html
[2] http://www.netbsd.org/Goals/redistribution.html
-- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau Ludovic.Rousseaufree.fr -- Normaliser Unix c'est comme pasteuriser le Camembert, L.R. -- *************************************************************** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to majordomo
linuxnet.com with unsubscribe sclinux ***************************************************************
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]