OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Erwann ABALEA (eabaleacertplus.com)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 10:58:54 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Francis wrote:

    > may be this question is out of topic, but I hope that
    > someone can help me. I need to know the differences
    > between smartcards which use T=0 and T=1 protocol.

    It's not off-topic.

    > There are differences in price, in capabilities, in
    > functionalities? Do exist also T=0 smartcards with
    > cryptoprocessor?

    The protocol is different, but the cards that support T=1 are not "better"
    than cards that support T=0. These are different protocols between the
    card reader and the card. If you want to know the technical details of
    both protocols, find the ISO-7816 document.

    There exists T=0 smartcards with a cryptoprocessor, of course: Gemplus'
    GemSAFE, Schlumberger's CryptoFlex and CyberFlex, ZeitControl's BasicCard
    ZC5.x, ... to name a few.

    -- 
    Erwann ABALEA <eabaleacertplus.com> - RSA PGP Key ID: 0x2D0EABD5
    -----
    Désolé, je suis vraiement trop con (mais je l'admet), j'y comprends rien
    à ces "kill file", pour moi c'est juste une sorte de censure/mépris public.
    -+- GA in Guide du Neuneu d'Usenet - N'avouez jamais. -+-
    

    *************************************************************** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to majordomolinuxnet.com with unsubscribe sclinux ***************************************************************