From: Karsten Ohme (widerstandt-online.de)
Date: Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:33:32 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ludovic Rousseau schrieb:

>On 4/25/05, Karsten Ohme <widerstandt-online.de> wrote:
>
>
>>Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It is not the correct way to go. Can't you use the ones from pcsc-lite
>>>event if pcsc-lite is not installed (just the source code)?
>>>
>>>
>>Okay. These files can also be moved to the pcsc-lite sources. But for a
>>Windows system these files must be offered in a separate packet and it
>>must be mentioned where to get it, best at the same location.
>>
>>
>
>Hmm! Maybe the separation between pure pcsc and libmusclecard was not
>a good idea after all. They have too many source files in common.
>
>Should we go back and have only one source archive as we had before 1.2.9-beta7?
>
>

Well, it is quite logical how it is now. It is reasonable that the
functionality of libmusclecard and and pcsclite is quite different. The
only difference for Windows systems is that some of the header files
must be available as prerequisites. If this is mentioned, this is
enough. But indeed also some sources files (I believe the tokenparser.c,
maybe some more ... ) which in Unix are part of the pcsclite library,
are necessary.

Bye, Karsten

>Regards,
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
Musclelists.musclecard.com
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]