From: Todd Denniston (Todd.Dennistonssa.crane.navy.mil)
Date: Wed Jan 25 2006 - 15:35:57 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Peter Williams wrote:
>
> yes. The hooks into muscle are hardly hidden. Whether those hooks are
> modern and viable, is a different question.
>
> Get it from the same source as your CAC. Folks here might be able to be
> provide info where your source should him/herself seek out files, etc.
>
> CAC is relatively dead, remember. its 3 years old, in a market where
> technology changes substantially every 2 years.
>

<ha ha only serious (HHOS)>
Come on you should know by now, commercially dead technology is brand new in
the government for at least 10 years, new for 20, required in operations for 30.
</HHOS>

>> From: Geoffrey Elgey <gelgeyvintela.com>
>> Reply-To: MUSCLE <musclelists.musclecard.com>
>> To: MUSCLE <musclelists.musclecard.com>
>> Subject: [Muscle] CAC and MUSCLE?
>> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:19:28 +1000
>>
>> G'day,
>>
>> I have been given a smartcard by the DoD, which I assume is a "Common
>> Access Card". The CAC specifications require that the card can be used
>> with MUSCLE. Is there a CAC bundle for muscleframework that needs to
>> be built to enable these cards to be used under Linux?

Please see
http://lists.drizzle.com/pipermail/muscle/2006-January/004830.html

_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
Musclelists.musclecard.com
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]