From: Martin Vogt (martin.vogtitwm.fraunhofer.de)
Date: Mon Feb 08 2010 - 08:51:09 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
>> PS: I saw that the latest svn got rid of the SHM interface and uses
>> sockets, very nice. This opens the possibility to make pcsc available
>> over network easier than before.(I already thought about doing this...)
>
> That was one of the motivations for removing the shared memory.
>

Do you have any implementation ideas?
should the libpcsc read a config file where it should search
for readers (locally, remote).

I think its should use some ssl encryption too, but that
can be left as a second step.

I think the "communication context" should be done in seperate
files, which needs an additional layer.
Curently the subsystem only reports back a fd, is this enough
or should there be more data (extend it to some struct)?
It should work only with fds but it maybe to few information.

I think the ltsp project implemented "remote usb sticks"
and figured out a safe way that only the correct user
can connect the usb daemon.

But maybe the first step is "let connect everyone and
do everything with the reader"

Martin
_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
Musclelists.musclecard.com
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]