mbabcockfibrespeed.net

• Next message: mouss: "Re: 4cs.com?"
• Previous message: mouss: "Re: Stack-Clean? (Was RE: weakness of aphachi?)"
• In reply to: Dave Horsfall: "4cs.com?"
• Next in thread: mouss: "Re: 4cs.com?"
• Reply: Michael T. Babcock: "Re: 4cs.com?"
• Reply: mouss: "Re: 4cs.com?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The beauty of censorship software ... does nothing to stop child pornographers and keeps security professionals from having legitimate discussions ;-)

Dave Horsfall wrote:

> Call me reactionary, but somehow I think a condition of being on this list
> is that you at least ought to accept mail from it...
>
> Date: 7 Nov 2000 7:13 GMT
> From: mailwatch4cs.com
> To: davehorsfall.org
> Subject: Packets seen on a firewall [*]
>
> YOUR EMAIL RECENTLY SENT TO jasonw4cs.com, firewallsLists.GNAC.NETON 11/7/00 2:13:29 AM WITH THE Packets seen on a firewall [*] WAS NOT DELIVERABLE. The Mailwatch program interpreted some of
> the content to be against company policy.

--
Michael T. Babcock, C.T.O. FibreSpeed
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomolists.gnac.net with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

• Next message: mouss: "Re: 4cs.com?"
• Previous message: mouss: "Re: Stack-Clean? (Was RE: weakness of aphachi?)"
• In reply to: Dave Horsfall: "4cs.com?"
• Next in thread: mouss: "Re: 4cs.com?"
• Reply: Michael T. Babcock: "Re: 4cs.com?"
• Reply: mouss: "Re: 4cs.com?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]