|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: RE:
From: Frederick M Avolio (fred
avolio.com)Date: Tue Nov 28 2000 - 16:29:35 CST
- Next message: Larry Paul: "Emily's response to the rumors"
- Previous message: Chris M. Lonvick: "RE:"
- In reply to: Chris M. Lonvick: "RE:"
- Next in thread: Chris M. Lonvick: "RE:"
- Next in thread: Crumrine, Gary L: "RE:"
- Reply: Frederick M Avolio: "RE:"
- Reply: Chris M. Lonvick: "RE:"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris,
STs and CCs and that's only part of the problem with this complex thing. My
main hatred (hmmm, no that's not to strong a word) of the CC is that it
easily fools the unsuspecting into thinking that it is *the* solution to
their problems. It sounds so wonderful. A common, government blessed
criteria. So they envision a single firewall criteria set that all
firewalls have to achieve making their selection job much easier. But that
is not what they get. In fact, I think it makes their selection harder
because first they have to understand security targets and criteria sets
and all the other stuff.
I've been on record in supporting ICSA Labs certification. I supported it
when a vendor, and still do. But if you don't like ICSA then go with some
other private sector certification. Or come up with your own with a simpler
criteria set. Not one that covers every possible computer-based product
that might need some kind of certification (ah ha! but it isn't even a
certification, is it). The Common Criteria is cumbersome and looks like it
was invented by government committee. And son-of-a-gun, it was...
Sorry. I guess I'm ranting (though not raving.. yet). Better adjust my
medication.
Fred
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
lists.gnac.net with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Next message: Larry Paul: "Emily's response to the rumors"
- Previous message: Chris M. Lonvick: "RE:"
- In reply to: Chris M. Lonvick: "RE:"
- Next in thread: Chris M. Lonvick: "RE:"
- Next in thread: Crumrine, Gary L: "RE:"
- Reply: Frederick M Avolio: "RE:"
- Reply: Chris M. Lonvick: "RE:"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]