|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: RE:( NAT and) freebsd
From: mouss (usebsd
free.fr)Date: Thu Nov 30 2000 - 09:51:41 CST
- Next message: Larry Paul: "RE: Emily's response to the rumors"
- Previous message: mark.teicher
networkice.com: "RE: Emily's response to the rumors"
- Maybe reply: mouss: "RE:( NAT and) freebsd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 09:22 30/11/00 +1030, Ben Nagy wrote:
>All the normal benefits of running an ALG versus a filter - protection from
>packet level attacks that don't involve the data channel.
Righ, that's a good motivation!
>I had a hell of a time compiling it, too. Ended up using the copy in the
>ports collection. I was making progress with the compile but it was taking
>way too long for a POC and I figured that since it was under actiove dev it
>would be fixed soon anyway, and by people that know how to code. ;)
let's hope they'll finish it soon.
cheers,
mouss
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
lists.gnac.net with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Next message: Larry Paul: "RE: Emily's response to the rumors"
- Previous message: mark.teicher
networkice.com: "RE: Emily's response to the rumors"
- Maybe reply: mouss: "RE:( NAT and) freebsd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]