OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Tony Rall (trallalmaden.ibm.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 16:05:43 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Thursday, 2001/10/04 at 16:20 AST, "Bilotti, Matthew"
    <mbilottilucent.com> wrote:
    > Does anyone know what the correct response a Firewall should have when
    > blocking a traceroute.
    > I assume it should not reply with a port unreachable.

    You're right - it shouldn't respond with "port unreachable".

    A firewall doesn't really know when a traceroute is being done - it only
    sees the individual packets involved in the traceroute sequence.

    There are 2 types of traceroute probes commonly used:

    UDP packets to high ports (the original traceroute implementations did
    this) - A firewall blocking this can either send back nothing or "ICMP
    destination unreachable, administratively prohibited".

    ICMP echo request packets - Normally nothing would be sent back (in the
    spirit of "don't send ICMP packets in response to ICMP packets"), but
    since this is an echo request I think it would also be ok to send back
    "ICMP destination unreachable, administratively prohibited".

    Responses (by other systems) to traceroute probes are ICMP packets ("dest.
    unreachable") - if blocking these, nothing should be sent back to the
    responder.

    Tony Rall
    _______________________________________________
    Firewalls mailing list
    Firewallslists.gnac.net
    http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls