Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD

Dag-Erling Smorgrav (desflood.ping.uio.no)
08 Sep 1999 09:49:24 +0200

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: dmparacnet.com: "Re: Layer 2 ethernet encryption?"
• Previous message: Sergey S. Kosyakov: "Re: Layer 2 ethernet encryption?"
• In reply to: dmparacnet.com: "Re: Layer 2 ethernet encryption?"
• Next in thread: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD"
• Next in thread: Nick Hibma: "Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD"
• Reply: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD"

John-Mark Gurney <gurney_jefn.org> writes:
> no, but we should include a reference to fstat... you can track down
> who had a udp socket open, but for some reason the addresses on my 3.0-R
> box for tcp streams outputed by netstat don't agree w/ any of the
> addresses that exist in the fstat output...

I fixed that bug a long time ago. What are you doing still running
3.0-R, anyway?

> looks like I should extend the description of -A to include a blurb
> about identifing processes which own a socket/stream...

Why? What's wrong with sockstat?

DES

-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - desflood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

• Next message: dmparacnet.com: "Re: Layer 2 ethernet encryption?"
• Previous message: Sergey S. Kosyakov: "Re: Layer 2 ethernet encryption?"
• In reply to: dmparacnet.com: "Re: Layer 2 ethernet encryption?"
• Next in thread: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD"
• Next in thread: Nick Hibma: "Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD"
• Reply: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Sep 08 1999 - 02:49:56 CDT