Re: scanning of port 12345

Brett Glass (brettlariat.org)
Sun, 10 Oct 1999 20:26:27 -0600

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Chris Williams: "Re: scanning of port 12345"
• Previous message: Will Andrews: "Re: chroot jail in pre 4.0"
• In reply to: Justin Wells: "chroot jail in pre 4.0"
• Next in thread: Nicholas Brawn: "Re: scanning of port 12345"
• Next in thread: James Wyatt: "Re: scanning of port 12345"
• Next in thread: Chris Williams: "Re: scanning of port 12345"
• Reply: Nicholas Brawn: "Re: scanning of port 12345"

At 06:10 PM 10/10/99 -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:

>Neither Netbus or BackOriface provide any machanisms for attacking a
>machine.

Not so. A remote sniffer is a great way to get passwords.

> Netbus is sold just like any other remote monitoring and admin
>tool including several that cost thousands of dollars. CDC (the authors
>of BO) have a webpage pointing out that there is almost no difference
>between their product that the Microsoft System Management Server.

And you believe them?

--Brett

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

• Next message: Chris Williams: "Re: scanning of port 12345"
• Previous message: Will Andrews: "Re: chroot jail in pre 4.0"
• In reply to: Justin Wells: "chroot jail in pre 4.0"
• Next in thread: Nicholas Brawn: "Re: scanning of port 12345"
• Next in thread: James Wyatt: "Re: scanning of port 12345"
• Next in thread: Chris Williams: "Re: scanning of port 12345"
• Reply: Nicholas Brawn: "Re: scanning of port 12345"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Oct 10 1999 - 21:25:32 CDT