Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability

Dan Busarow (dandpcsys.com)
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:25:39 -0800 (PST)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Adam Laurie: "Re: OpenSSH patches"
• Previous message: Charlie ROOT: "(no subject)"
• Next in thread: Mitch Collinsworth: "Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability"
• Reply: Mitch Collinsworth: "Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability"
• Reply: matt: "Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability"

On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, matt wrote:
> The ports tree currently has 8.2.1 though, I'm sure alot of people have
> resorted to using this, I have. Has the maintainer of this port been
> contacted yet? -matt

bind builds perfectly from the source.

# make stdlinks
# make clean
# make depend
# make all
# make install

Done. It looks for named.conf in /etc instead of /etc/namedb but we
have named_flags available or you can just symlink /etc/namedb/named.conf
to /etc/named.conf which is what I do.

You could also edit src/port/freebsd/Makefile.set and change
DESTETC to suit.

Relying on ports for crital bits such as bind and sendmail seems, uh,
risky?

Dan

-- 
 Dan Busarow                                                  949 443 4172
 Dana Point Communications, Inc.                            dandpcsys.com
 Dana Point, California  83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4   8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

• Next message: Adam Laurie: "Re: OpenSSH patches"
• Previous message: Charlie ROOT: "(no subject)"
• Next in thread: Mitch Collinsworth: "Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability"
• Reply: Mitch Collinsworth: "Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability"
• Reply: matt: "Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Nov 11 1999 - 12:25:49 CST