Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - work around ??

Chris D. Faulhaber (jedgarfxp.org)
Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:00:51 -0500 (EST)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Cy Schubert: "Re: Why not sandbox BIND?"
• Previous message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - work around ??"
• In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - work around ??"

On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Mike Tancsa wrote:

> At 11:12 PM 11/14/99 -0500, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> >Yes, but it would also be against the patents of our wonderful RSA.
> >Then again, the patent runs out next year; and right now, it's still
> >pretty much "honor system" unless the RSA wants to sue you for some
> >reason. I can't condone this technically illegal action. The better
> >question is why aren't you using OpenSSH?
>
> Where is the best place to read about / follow OpenSSH ? I just tried
> OpenSSH and it does not seem to work with the version of SecureCRT that I
> am using. I get past the authnetication phase, but then disconnected with
> the message on the client side saying
>
> "Sever does not support Max Packet Size. Continuing" and then nothing.
>

We have the same problem using SecureCRT v2.3.2, however, v3.0 works just
fine.

-----
Chris D. Faulhaber <jedgarfxp.org> | All the true gurus I've met never
System/Network Administrator, | claimed they were one, and always
Reality Check Information, Inc. | pointed to someone better.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

• Next message: Cy Schubert: "Re: Why not sandbox BIND?"
• Previous message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - work around ??"
• In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - work around ??"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Nov 15 1999 - 10:01:10 CST