Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal

Subject: Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal
From: Dan Moschuk (danFreeBSD.ORG)
Date: Sat Jan 01 2000 - 20:44:42 CST

• Next message: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Previous message: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• In reply to: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Next in thread: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Reply: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Reply: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

| Let me know what you all think! I still haven't quite decided, but I
| think packets which fail the SHA-1 test should be silently dropped, or
| have a counter of them, rather than dropping the connection. Currently,
| the connection is dropped and error messages displayed/transmitted. I
| welcome input on that and all parts of this proposal :)

Hi Brian,

Forgive my ignorance of the SSH protocol, but what would happen if two
projects forked the OpenSSH code and also bumped the minor version number
up with their own expansions and modifications?

-- 
Dan Moschuk (TFreak!danfreebsd.org)
"No good deed goes unpunished."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

• Next message: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Previous message: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• In reply to: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Next in thread: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Reply: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Reply: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Jan 01 2000 - 20:40:25 CST