|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal
Subject: Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal
From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman (green
FreeBSD.org)
Date: Sat Jan 01 2000 - 22:24:13 CST
- Next message: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Previous message: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- In reply to: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Next in thread: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Reply: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Reply: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Dan Moschuk wrote:
>
> | Let me know what you all think! I still haven't quite decided, but I
> | think packets which fail the SHA-1 test should be silently dropped, or
> | have a counter of them, rather than dropping the connection. Currently,
> | the connection is dropped and error messages displayed/transmitted. I
> | welcome input on that and all parts of this proposal :)
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Forgive my ignorance of the SSH protocol, but what would happen if two
> projects forked the OpenSSH code and also bumped the minor version number
> up with their own expansions and modifications?
They'd make sure that they were compatible with eachother :) Really, I
think the same thing will be adopted by both sides, but it would need
people who can cooperate. Alfred and I have already confirmed that
it's not possible to work with theo; markus, on the other hand, seems
to just be ignoring us.
I really think the code fork is necessary because OpenBSD (Theo)
simply will not listen to reason and correct his code. It's fighting
an uphill battle when you have to keep fixing code that someone else
keeps breaking. Yes, we have pointed out specific bugs, and only
gotten flames in return. You can't have collaboration without
communication, and communication with the one who's "in charge" is
pointless.
>
> --
> Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dan
freebsd.org)
> "No good deed goes unpunished."
>
-- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / greenFreeBSD.org `------------------------------'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Previous message: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- In reply to: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Next in thread: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Reply: Brian Fundakowski Feldman: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Reply: Dan Moschuk: "Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Jan 01 2000 - 22:25:41 CST