|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: RE: Random Sequence Numbers
From: Brett Glass (brett
lariat.org)Date: Fri Feb 11 2000 - 12:29:46 CST
- Next message: Omachonu Ogali: "Re: Random Sequence Numbers"
- Previous message: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Random Sequence Numbers"
- In reply to: Garrett Wollman: "RE: Random Sequence Numbers"
- Next in thread: Omachonu Ogali: "Re: Random Sequence Numbers"
- Reply: Brett Glass: "RE: Random Sequence Numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 09:14 AM 2/11/2000 , Garrett Wollman wrote:
>Please, everyone, stop repeating this red herring. T/TCP has
>absolutely nothing to do with it, and never has. If you drop such
>packets, you break the TCP specification. See, e.g., RFC 1025.
IIRC, 1025 wasn't a spec; it was a description of the InterOP
TCP/IP "bake-off." In that one, machines were required to HANDLE
nastygrams such as SYN+FINs, but not to take them seriously.
--Brett
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Omachonu Ogali: "Re: Random Sequence Numbers"
- Previous message: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Random Sequence Numbers"
- In reply to: Garrett Wollman: "RE: Random Sequence Numbers"
- Next in thread: Omachonu Ogali: "Re: Random Sequence Numbers"
- Reply: Brett Glass: "RE: Random Sequence Numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]