|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Doscmd
From: Bill Fumerola (billf
chc-chimes.com)Date: Wed Feb 16 2000 - 00:13:04 CST
- Next message: Brett Glass: "Re: Doscmd"
- Previous message: Matt Heckaman: "Re: Doscmd"
- In reply to: Kuzak: "Doscmd"
- Next in thread: Brett Glass: "Re: Doscmd"
- Reply: Bill Fumerola: "Re: Doscmd"
- Reply: Brett Glass: "Re: Doscmd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:56:41PM -0800, Kuzak wrote:
> A friend of mine was asking me about an exploit
> for 3.4-STABLE.. and I wasn't quite sure about
> the answer.. Basically is it safe to disable
> /usr/bin/doscmd ( chmod 000 /usr/bin/doscmd ),
> and will this render this exploit useless?
doscmd isn't suid to begin with, so I don't see the problem.
I could be missing the point though.
doscmd however can be safely disabled or removed without
any negative effect.
-- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect Computer Horizons Corp - CVM e-mail: billfchc-chimes.com / billf
FreeBSD.org Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Brett Glass: "Re: Doscmd"
- Previous message: Matt Heckaman: "Re: Doscmd"
- In reply to: Kuzak: "Doscmd"
- Next in thread: Brett Glass: "Re: Doscmd"
- Reply: Bill Fumerola: "Re: Doscmd"
- Reply: Brett Glass: "Re: Doscmd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]