|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)
From: Alfred Perlstein (bright
wintelcom.net)Date: Sat Mar 04 2000 - 13:00:55 CST
- Next message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Previous message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Reply: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
* Mike Tancsa <mikesentex.net> [000304 10:01] wrote:
> At 12:21 PM 3/4/2000 -0500, Jonathan Fortin wrote:
> >ulimit
>
> In what way? The bug does not appear to be a resource issue
patch your kernel to make all aio calls return ENOSYS. If it hasn't
been backported in a bit I think i'll take a look at having it disabled
in -stable by default.
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Previous message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Reply: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]