|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall
From: Mike Hoskins (mike
adept.org)Date: Tue Jul 25 2000 - 16:52:35 CDT
- Next message: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Previous message: Rodney W. Grimes: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- In reply to: Rodney W. Grimes: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Next in thread: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Next in thread: Shaun Jurrens: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Reply: Mike Hoskins: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> a) The non-problem it attempts to solve can be handled by a correct
> ipfw rule set.
Agreed.
> c) It also totally ignores the fact that the problematic IP addresses
> are much more than RFC1918 and include the following:
> 0.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, 192.0.2.0/24, 169.254.0.0/16, 240.0.0.0/4
> that need to be dealt with properly and carefully at both interfaces
> in a firewall.
Point taken, and agreed.
-mrh
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Previous message: Rodney W. Grimes: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- In reply to: Rodney W. Grimes: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Next in thread: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Next in thread: Shaun Jurrens: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Reply: Mike Hoskins: "Re: Problems with natd and simple firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]