|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)
From: Miklos Niedermayer (mico
bsd.hu)Date: Sat Jul 29 2000 - 12:48:21 CDT
- Next message: Bill Fumerola: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Previous message: Castor Fu: "Re: CDSA ?"
- In reply to: Mike Hoskins: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Next in thread: Bill Fumerola: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Next in thread: Gerhard Sittig: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Reply: Miklos Niedermayer: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Reply: Bill Fumerola: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hell,
Mike Hoskins:
> The only real reason I've heard ipf reccomended since ipfw got
> keep-state/check-state is ipnat.
I think that ipfw's statefullness is in a very early stage.
-- ______ o _. __ / / / (_(_(__(_)bsd.hu
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Bill Fumerola: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Previous message: Castor Fu: "Re: CDSA ?"
- In reply to: Mike Hoskins: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Next in thread: Bill Fumerola: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Next in thread: Gerhard Sittig: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Reply: Miklos Niedermayer: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Reply: Bill Fumerola: "Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]