|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: IPFW + bridge fix.
From: Kris Kennaway (kris
hub.freebsd.org)Date: Fri Aug 04 2000 - 16:21:40 CDT
- Next message: Lars: "How to install FWTK 2.1 port with transparent proxy support"
- Previous message: Bruce M. Simpson: "Re: What will I lose if ssh is no more suid root?"
- In reply to: Slawek Zak: "IPFW + bridge fix."
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: IPFW + bridge fix."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4 Aug 2000, Slawek Zak wrote:
> Is anyone working on the fix for problem so irresponsibly reported to
> bugtraq by Darren Reed. Is any security advisory going to be released.
It's being investigated, but may take a week or more to get fixed due to
people's schedules. This is why posting it first was so inappropriate,
because it creates undue pressure on people who would have fixed it anyway
had they been told.
A security advisory will be released if the claims are verified.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythealum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Lars: "How to install FWTK 2.1 port with transparent proxy support"
- Previous message: Bruce M. Simpson: "Re: What will I lose if ssh is no more suid root?"
- In reply to: Slawek Zak: "IPFW + bridge fix."
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: IPFW + bridge fix."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]