|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?
From: Gerhard Sittig (Gerhard.Sittig
gmx.net)Date: Fri Aug 11 2000 - 13:23:52 CDT
- Next message: Gerhard Sittig: "Re: Strange ipnat behaviour"
- Previous message: Nick Evans: "RE: Strange ipnat behaviour"
- In reply to: Sheldon Hearn: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Next in thread: Matt Heckaman: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Next in thread: Will Andrews: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Reply: Gerhard Sittig: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Reply: Matt Heckaman: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:27 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 19:37:51 +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>
> > Then what about a "diff -u $FILES | grep -v '^ '"? Or "diff
> > -u $FILES | grep '^[+-
]'"? (I guess the first fits better)
>
> A lot of work for what gain exactly? You want plusses and
> minuses instead of angle-brackets? Surely there are more
> important things we could be spending our energy on? :-)
It's not exactly me who wants this change. But I can feel very
well where this wish comes from. Since "readability" sometimes
is a question of getting used to or having anything in a similar
manner I'm almost sure that this simple change will make quite
many admins happy. And I'm very aware of the fact that not every
diff format is equally suitable for any kind of document or
change style.
BTW: The angle brackets can cause irritation(sp?) quite easily,
especially when sent by email. The new code looks like a
citation then. With all the consequences a mail frontend can do
to these in contrast to the other parts of the message. And have
you ever tried to read a unified diff with a MS "mail frontend"
in its default setup? Not that I did (I keep away from those as
much as I can), but I've seen how it gets mangled. :) And
despite of the fact that I don't think context diffs are readable
there are a few people out there who think they are. And they
might feel strong about this.
So let everyone have _their_ preferred format and enjoy the
positive feedback. :>
virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig
gmx.net
--
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Gerhard Sittig: "Re: Strange ipnat behaviour"
- Previous message: Nick Evans: "RE: Strange ipnat behaviour"
- In reply to: Sheldon Hearn: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Next in thread: Matt Heckaman: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Next in thread: Will Andrews: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Reply: Gerhard Sittig: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Reply: Matt Heckaman: "Re: Unified diff format in output of /etc/security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]