|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Proposed minor mod to openssh for interactive operation
From: Garance A Drosihn (drosih
rpi.edu)Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 14:54:25 CDT
- Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: ftpd bug in FreeBSD through at least 3.4"
- Previous message: John Howie: "Re: ftpd bug in FreeBSD through at least 3.4"
- Next in thread: Matt Dillon: "Re: Proposed minor mod to openssh for interactive operation"
- Reply: Matt Dillon: "Re: Proposed minor mod to openssh for interactive operation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 5:23 PM -0700 9/29/00, Matt Dillon wrote:
> At the moment openssh only turns on TCP_NODELAY etc if it
> thinks you are creating an interactive shell, based on
> whether it allocates a pty or not.
>
> Unfortunately, I have an application (and I expect this
> would be useful generally) which uses a ssh link between
> two programs interactively.
> That is, send command, wait response, send command, wait
> response. Delaying packets is a bad idea and cuts
> performance over the link by about 20%.
Would it be more appropriate to use stunnel (in ports) instead
of an ssh connection for your application?
(I'm just wondering...)
--- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gadeclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih
rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: ftpd bug in FreeBSD through at least 3.4"
- Previous message: John Howie: "Re: ftpd bug in FreeBSD through at least 3.4"
- Next in thread: Matt Dillon: "Re: Proposed minor mod to openssh for interactive operation"
- Reply: Matt Dillon: "Re: Proposed minor mod to openssh for interactive operation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]