|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Steven Kehlet (kehlet
fisix.com)Date: Wed Jan 03 2001 - 15:54:54 CST
> > numbers on established packets, etc). I see you got this from
> > http://www.bsdtoday.com/2000/December/Features359.html.
>
> Yes, it was a very helpful site. Hopefully I haven't given the impression
> that this was personal creation; in future I need to make notation
I'm sure no one got upset :-). I only pointed it out because the
author of that page (Peter Brezny) had joined in this thread, and
other people might be interested in that url as well :-). Credit
never hurts, but in this community we're all borrowing from each
other anyway...
> Ah, I did suspect I had missed the full nature of the problem. On the off
> chance that I hadn't I just wanted to forward what I had, I know searching
> for answers can be quite time consuming on occassion and I had it on hand.
THANKS for offering your rules for discussion... I should have made
my appreciation more clear :-). There are very few examples of
stateful ipfw + natd out there...
Thanks! :-),
Steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]