OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Graywane (graywanehome.com)
Date: Tue May 01 2001 - 16:04:50 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 04:23:54PM -0400, Mipam wrote:
    > On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:16:16PM +0300, Alex Popa wrote:
    > > The reason why this bothers me is that I sometimes use ssh to tunnel ssh
    > > connections (blowfish encryption in a 3DES tunnel, anyone?)
    >
    > Some ppl think that using encryption to encrypt allrdy encrypted data
    > is dubble secure. This is in general certainly not true.
    > Instead, sometimes it becomes only easier to crack it.
    > So i wouldnt advice to use ssh in a ssh tunnel to aviod possible
    > problems like that.

    You are missing the point. Lets say you are connecting from machine A to
    machine B using ssh. You setup a port forward so that connections to machine
    B at port 9999 are forwarded to machine A at port 22. Now you connect from
    machine C to port 9999 of machine B using ssh. As long as you trust ssh on
    machine C and sshd on machine A then encrypting the second tunnel avoids
    problems with the marginally trusted machine B (assuming you check your host
    key fingerprints). It also allows you to bind sshd on machine A to 127.0.0.1
    rather than 0.0.0.0

    -- 
    Note: See http://www.members.home.net/graywane/ for PGP information.
    

    To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message