|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Peter Pentchev (roam
orbitel.bg)Date: Fri May 04 2001 - 09:17:23 CDT
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:04:32AM -0400, Andrew Barros wrote:
> Yes, ns1.tjhsst.edu is on the same ethernet segment as the box.
>
> 127.0.0.1 is in /etc/hosts
There is at least one MTA I know (qmail) that does not honor /etc/hosts.
There might be others like that. Make sure a lookup for 127.0.0.1 is
answered by your nameserver.
Actually, this is something that I was going to ask about in my previous
post, but I plain forgot ;) Yes, telnetd does honor /etc/hosts, some MTA's
don't. Is 127.0.0.1 in DNS?
G'luck,
Peter
-- When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish.> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 03:57:25PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > ->On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 08:40:39AM -0400, Andrew Barros wrote: > ->> > ->> There are two things that I'm sure of > ->> > ->> 1) The boxes have correct reverse DNS > ->> > ->> 2) They use ns1.tjhsst.edu as their nameserver(a different box) > ->> which has the correct reverse DNS > ->> > ->> The problem is that while these things are true, and out T1 is up > ->> it works normally. When the T1 goes out, it takes a _long_ time. Telnet > ->> ,however, is unaffected by this. > -> > ->When you say 'correct reverse DNS', you do mean 127.0.0.1 too, right? > ->And (a stupid question, but one that needs asking nevertheless) ns1.tjhsst.edu > ->is reachable when your T1 goes down, right?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]